View Full Version : :< Where my magic version Bm2 EST!

06-16-2010, 02:24 PM
>:O You makes magic version sigmetal and just end there? o_o I'm waiting on my cannon triple casting in bm2, son.

06-17-2010, 08:01 AM
They want your lunch money. Then they'll give it to you.

06-17-2010, 09:26 AM
They want your lunch money. Then they'll give it to you.

It's sad because it's true. >_>

07-13-2010, 12:19 AM

07-13-2010, 01:33 AM

07-13-2010, 02:07 PM
well maybe mfs will wake up to the fact that fs is ment to be sfs SFS are the true fs class the rest are just empty shells of what they could be

07-14-2010, 10:46 AM
mfs are greater than sfs in many aspects of the game. This includes but is not limited to: greater survivability in pve, greater dps with and without mb, faster dungeon solos, better aoe for ca, and cheaper gear which often equates into greater overall stats.

07-15-2010, 09:53 AM

sfs> mfs in pve, we can actually solo bosses and we out-tank mfs in stronger dungs like ft2, aos2, wtc because we can use bm2 without sacrificing dps
sfs>mfs in pk, i haven't met any fs thats good in pk at all lol
sfs>mfs in pvp
sfs> mfs in war
sfs> mfs in CA, i LOL'd so hard when you said you have more aoe than us
mfs> sfs in freestlye pvp, this is the only aspect of cabal were i think an mfs can out-do an sfs because in freestlye its hard to re-target a target that constantly fades and we break combo too often due to that, an mfs can stay in their position for a while without worrying about range and they still have decent dmg

07-15-2010, 04:59 PM
mfs are much better in pve not that any fs should have prob... You can cast up to 4 lances or 3 cannons in the time it takes to cast SS or SB. Thats 4 times the hp recovery as well as better dps. Greater hp recovery also compensates for the defense you lose from not going bm2 as for regarding bosses. PvE is not the same as bossing tho
sfs>mfs for bosses is an accurate assumption. Neither has any problem tanking, however, but its often easier to use mortalbane as an mfs.
mfs > sfs in ca Fs bm2 attack has a much smaller 'area' than cannons; it has larger pierce. Obviously bm2 attack is better dps than an mfs with cannons, but the cannons have MUCH better aoe which is what matters for ca.
As for pvp its very naive to say sfs>mfs. There is no active sfs on Venus that I'm not greater than 50% versus, and honestly my gear is not great and I'm not even 170.
sfs>mfs in war is accurate but that doesn't mean mfs is bad in nw.
idk anything about freestyle pvp or pk but mfs do have more range.

07-15-2010, 05:41 PM
Cannon - notice the circular aoe
http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/8190/cabalver115100715172400.jpg (http://img535.imageshack.us/i/cabalver115100715172400.jpg/)

BM2 shield attack - notice how it only affects a line through pierce
http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/8190/cabalver115100715172400.jpg (http://img341.imageshack.us/i/cabalver115100715172400.jpg/)

SS's taken in the same mob consecutively