Warrior vs Force Shielder

[forumaccount]

if a wa has hp rune and at least r14 honor, 4500 hp is ezy at 170

on another note, i doubt ss does enough dmg to do over 2k crit on a wa with over 1k def. for example, my lvl18 sw does about 3300 before dmg mitigation, WITH a leg (thats over 1100 base atk). so if we assume a ss does that much as well without a leg (u would have to be pretty dam geared to hit that number anyway), u would still do less than 600 dmg, about 550 non crit in normal pvp. if we assume use of a 40 dmg helm, k red, and 3 cr+2, u have around 260% cd figuratively when u use ss. thats rite around 2k, but def not enuf to 2hko a wa with 4.5k hp

4k hp and 1k def sure, but not 4.5k, and ur chances of critting both is slightly over 1 in 4 at best

[cerverus3]

also dont forget if u get down my WA skill u are down for the count =3

[jimbo]

bro if u have mb on while panic cry is on u all the WA needs to do is WW and 1shot u...

+1 you dont even have to crit to kill

[yomo]

bro if u have mb on while panic cry is on u all the WA needs to do is WW and 1shot u...

if i have mb on and a WA tried to WW me, i'd kill him before he even stops casting WW lol

as for the main topic:
WA bm2 > FS bm2 aoe wise
FS bm2> WA bm2 dmg wise and is much better suited for pk than WA's cause we have a longer range/more dmg
out side of bm's, WA is genrally the better class, highest HP, 2nd highest def, good dmg and decent range as a sword class, and not to mention a greater support class with fury/ms/and panic

so overall, WA> FS

[forumaccount]

frankly speaking i think fs's bm2 is actually weaker than wa's cuz it atks slower even if it may do a lil more dmg per individual hit, and fs bm2 is weaker in pk in general because fs lacks ii, so fs would keep getting knocked down/stunned and that severely limit their dmg output, not to mention having to untarget after EVERY hit

[yomo]

getting knocked down and having to retarget after every hit shouldn't be a problem at all for a skilled player, and the diff between the atk speed on fs bm2/ wa bm2 isn't even noticeable, i play both chars and i think WA's might have a 1-2 milisecond faster cast, which wont make up for the over 1k++ dmg difference

[forumaccount]

sure it isnt just diff in gears? from wat i hear wa bm2 is ~.8s atks and fs is 1s, and im sure ur wa cant have the same gears as ur fs. ive always thought fs bm2 as just an annoyance in war since its ezy for wi/fa to stun them and mess em up, or ppl I love you >.<♥I love you >.<♥I love you >.<♥I love you >.<♥ and dont know how to get up when knocked down

[yomo]

i wasn't comparing dmg with my WA vs my FS-i was comparing the cast time between the swings, i was comparing it with other WA's by watching their vids, i can do 1k+ more dmg than them in bm2 if not, more...and im still lacking a bunch of gear such as s.amp rune, hp steal rune, atk rune, bof7s, rof10s, 20% dmg weps and a 40% dmg helm

[Hasufel]

WA bm2 is way better.say soloing for bosses.WA will out dps the fs by far.Does more dmg each hit since the WA attacks faster and should have higher base CD then the fs and the fs cant use skills when in bm2 which is where he gets most of his crit damage..well he can its just not logical.Plus panic cry and bloody.FS has AOD/MB and thats great and all but it cant compete.

You wont see an fs soloing pluma.....

[forumblahblah]

Yomo, what kind of WA have you been fighting?
A Wa can EASILY one hit if he crits ww when he goes BS and you go MB.


P.S. once WW is casted, the dmg is isntantly dealt and if it does one hit you, it's over before the casting of WW is even done. Pretty much like any other class.