Better Boss Hunter SFS vs. MFS

**yomo** · 05-10-2010, 02:55 PM

lol even if they do have +6 forcy amp, its still hard for them to tank bosses, yes if they combo they will vamp more, but i generally gget like 40 hp back a hit from one of my bm2 swings, so that really doesn't help lol

you can ask any good mFS in merc or venus and they'll tell you that mfs cant solo sht, overall sFS is genrally better than mFS in msot aspects of gamplay

**otice1** · 05-10-2010, 03:36 PM

Is that why mFS have much better ft solo times than sFS do?
Also the reason mFS can't solo is an issue of damage not survival; it is an issue of damage vs SP conservation. And a good mFS can tank just fine.

**YoungForum** · 05-10-2010, 11:55 PM

I thought Mfs didnt like wearing high+'d forcium cuz it messes with there stats or somethin.

**Nanjirou** · 05-11-2010, 01:54 AM

Mfs who wear forcium have the advantage of super boosted defense. To make up for the loss in stats you prob need +7 forcium wepsx_x

**WIpwns** · 05-11-2010, 04:36 AM

Originally Posted by Nanjirou

Mfs who wear forcium have the advantage of super boosted defense. To make up for the loss in stats you prob need +7 forcium wepsx_x

keke

**Leonhart** · 05-11-2010, 04:46 AM

Originally Posted by otice1

Is that why mFS have much better ft solo times than sFS do?
Also the reason mFS can't solo is an issue of damage not survival; it is an issue of damage vs SP conservation. And a good mFS can tank just fine.

mFS have largely died out due to many changes to FS.

Back 2 years ago a mFS woulda been better no question.

BTW, if you have a good party in PF, a sFS can stay in MB since BM2 is ranged.

**yomo** · 05-12-2010, 05:23 AM

Originally Posted by otice1

Is that why mFS have much better ft solo times than sFS do?
Also the reason mFS can't solo is an issue of damage not survival; it is an issue of damage vs SP conservation. And a good mFS can tank just fine.

FT1 is a babycake dungeon, easy to tank all the bosses and mfs can combo through it. and if its an issue of dmg, why pick mFS in the first place? lol. sFS use normal atk in bm2, so it doens't waste sp and u get more def in in bm2 than in bm1, its a no-brainer, sFS > mFS

**otice1** · 05-12-2010, 12:15 PM

Originally Posted by yomo

FT1 is a babycake dungeon, easy to tank all the bosses and mfs can combo through it. and if its an issue of dmg, why pick mFS in the first place? lol. sFS use normal atk in bm2, so it doens't waste sp and u get more def in in bm2 than in bm1, its a no-brainer, sFS > mFS

Thanks for only responding to half the quote. mFS dps > sFS dps, thats a fact
The only problem is mFS use more sp in the process so sFS are better at conserving sp
personally i would rather have dps than sp conservation but that is more of a personal preference