Facebook Twitter Youtube Twitch
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 114

Thread: WA bm3 on pluma

  1. #21
    Shadow Titanium Pakamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    368
    Korean WA was stronger without pots ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  2. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    224
    Quote Originally Posted by Pakamon View Post
    Korean WA was stronger without pots ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    maybe because they have 14% amp parts? derp

  3. #23
    Titanium Syth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by hellomydear View Post
    Yup Bm3 is garbage for WA. Raven bird just proved it.
    burning doesnt have the best gs for wa,so if bm3 works or not it still needs to be proven.idk if i should say this or not but i think burning is gone for top wa.using that amount of pots and hes dmg is freaking low,he was only able to solo it cuz he critced on the last 3 attacks which made the exact amount of dmg to kill pluma or he would have failed.so yea we need a wa with more dmg to see if it works or not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrea View Post
    A radical suggestion. You really have to motivate people to either start (or keep) playing this game.
    ^ for ESTsoft

  4. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    224
    Quote Originally Posted by Syth View Post
    burning doesnt have the best gs for wa,so if bm3 works or not it still needs to be proven.idk if i should say this or not but i think burning is gone for top wa.using that amount of pots and hes dmg is freaking low,he was only able to solo it cuz he critced on the last 3 attacks which made the exact amount of dmg to kill pluma or he would have failed.so yea we need a wa with more dmg to see if it works or not.
    where is chris, oh wait he hr 20...

  5. #25
    Shadow Titanium Pakamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by Syth View Post
    burning doesnt have the best gs for wa,so if bm3 works or not it still needs to be proven.idk if i should say this or not but i think burning is gone for top wa.using that amount of pots and hes dmg is freaking low,he was only able to solo it cuz he critced on the last 3 attacks which made the exact amount of dmg to kill pluma or he would have failed.so yea we need a wa with more dmg to see if it works or not.
    So this is not about BM3, it's about who has better gears now? Let's go ask a GM how BM3 works then.

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,613
    Quote Originally Posted by Pakamon View Post
    Korean WA was stronger without pots ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    that WA posted his stats in the video description. had something like 80 amp and 180 cd lol.

  7. #27
    Titanium Syth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by Pakamon View Post
    So this is not about BM3, it's about who has better gears now? Let's go ask a GM how BM3 works then.
    wut i am saying is that wa bm3 dmg should be higher if u look at the stats and his dmg ed ass,ppl shouldnt say bm3 s just cuz he barely was able to solo pluma,his gs s for wa.
    i am not saying hes not skilled and he duno how to play wa,i am talking about ppl saying wa bm3 s just cuz he barely did it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrea View Post
    A radical suggestion. You really have to motivate people to either start (or keep) playing this game.
    ^ for ESTsoft

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Syth View Post
    wut i am saying is that wa bm3 dmg should be higher if u look at the stats and his dmg ed ass,ppl shouldnt say bm3 s just cuz he barely was able to solo pluma,his gs s for wa.
    i am not saying hes not skilled and he duno how to play wa,i am talking about ppl saying wa bm3 s just cuz he barely did it.
    what?

  9. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,613
    Quote Originally Posted by Syth View Post
    wut i am saying is that wa bm3 dmg should be higher if u look at the stats and his dmg ed ass,ppl shouldnt say bm3 s just cuz he barely was able to solo pluma,his gs s for wa.
    i am not saying hes not skilled and he duno how to play wa,i am talking about ppl saying wa bm3 s just cuz he barely did it.
    180 rank A and B skill:

    +70% amp, +1067 add damage

    Pluma defense for a lv.181 = 1800

    I dont know Br's exact stats but lets say 1200 attack, 65 amp, 180 cd.

    (1200+500)*[1+(.01(65+70+7))] +1067 = 5181

    5181 - 1800 = 3381 noncrit

    3381 * 2.8 = 9467 crit

    This does not include pots
    ______________________

    If you add in 50 amp for buff pots, you get a 4289 noncrit, and 12010 crit, which is pretty much what BR hits in the video.

    So how is WA bm3 supposed to hit harder when you "look at the stats" lol?

    Yeah an 80 cd gs would hit harder for bm3 but considering WA's rate penalty compared to other classes, i think his gs is pretty damn good. How many WA have better stats than BR? I doubt that any WA in NA can do this solo significantly faster atm; to do so would require Bloody.

    The whole point of this thread was so show BM3 isn't a lot better than BM2, which is a fact, and you can't just say BM3 is fawking awesome and BR's stats just suck for bm3. lol.
    Last edited by Cathy; 03-13-2012 at 04:48 PM.

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,246
    I find this thread extremely entertaining now

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •