martial or battle?

[relentless1]

im really knew to the fa char. i was wondering which is better for archers martial or battle. ive heard that alot of people use martial. i would like to know how this benifits the char.

[Alleluia]

martial makes a FA more powerful, but more squishy at the same time

[relentless1]

ah, thnks

[ForumFiery]

as mFA, you get more magic, but your defense fail, if you can't get forcium amp I would just go martial. also, martial FA have trouble in CA, which make it hard to lvl.

in my opinion the order for FA should be Forcium battle> Martial > Osm/TG battle

[YumCookies]

If you like to pvp/ war/ pk more then I'd say martial is a better choice. Battle is more of pve.

[Cstriker]

You really won't be worrying about going martial or battle until around 100+, where you will be planning on long term gear. Martial allows you to hit harder, and allows your BM2 to have better potential. Battle gives you a bit more defense and survivability, but unless you have forc FAs are always going to be squishy, martial or not.

[ForumFiery]

mFA hard to lvl to 170, if you gonna be martial, lvl it with battle gears first lol

but again, Forc>Martial> osm/tg battle because of the reason Cstriker stated

[Enso]

I have no trouble leveling as a martial FA. Just need average vamp gear and know how to mob cornus.

[ForumFiery]

I have no trouble leveling as a martial FA. Just need average vamp gear and know how to mob cornus.

the most efficent way is CA. PF is useless after 155

[LastHour]

the most efficent way is CA. PF is useless after 155

Eh I disagree, cabal is not a hard game to level. It'll take more time than the hax exp CA gives, but its still nothing like traditional korean grinders.