Martial-pve only/in pvp 2 hits are enough
Battle in my oppinion ,if u get the items you need...you could deal a really imba damage both pve pvp and reach even 700 def..
My oppinion :battle>martial
Martial-pve only/in pvp 2 hits are enough
Battle in my oppinion ,if u get the items you need...you could deal a really imba damage both pve pvp and reach even 700 def..
My oppinion :battle>martial
that would really depend how endgame ure talking about. if ure able to get forcy 7amp with hp steal/amp/hp then battle can be better. if ure able to get full event sig u can still maybe argue battle > martial. if u are using teragrace/osm or below then martial 100% better
mfa all the way
Sorrry 17x Procyon
----------AioN----------
If you plan to play your class as it is meant to be... go battle. You NEED fc to run FT2 and do your job as a healer. Otherwise go play another class.... if you like pvp, play a WA or BL.
I would have to disagree with your implication that force archers are bad in PvP.
The dps that force archers deal out (both martial and battle) is high enough to outweigh any defense disadvantages. Also FA's can have high HP so they can withstand large amounts of damage.
all i'm getting from fiery is "gobble gobble gobble crap crap crap"
don't take advice from alz buyers.
http://eternitydia.blogspot.com/2009...r-martial.html ftw.
Just dont be a fail example of Martial FA like Celija. and if ure gunna get rank 16 honor make sure a FA like me who has less hp and level wont make u eat snow three times. considering Im Terra Battle build. and oh dont QQ too and ask ur guildies to help you kill me coz thats just a shame.
Last edited by MamaMiaYoe; 07-04-2010 at 06:54 AM.
In another dimension...Miavii is still alive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku4vL17sEEU&edit=vd
aww mia thats not nice =x
Sorrry 17x Procyon
----------AioN----------
martial for war
Bookmarks