nation war

[toibidien]

Its a pillow.



Its a pet.








Its a pillow-pet!






i liek nation war (just keeping this out of off-topic section)

[KeroKero]

Nation wars need moar people =O

[Fishy]

flunkin people need to actually come to war......lmao i miss the days when 65v65 was a common occurance v.v

[Rastan]

Just make the losers of the war receive nothing and people will actually have some pride to fight again....a little motivation goes a long way

[LILCHAOLAO]

It was like that before....

[Fishy]

It was like that before....

they should make it that regardless of your 30 pts, you get NOTHING if you lose.....that will DEFINITELY make people start taking it seriously. Like Lacard said, people need to show some pride again. I'm in T3 and only 150......yet i seem to have a lot more balls than some of the 170s i've warred with. It's absolutely horrific and pathetic

[Sheep]

they should make it that regardless of your 30 pts, you get NOTHING if you lose.....that will DEFINITELY make people start taking it seriously. Like Lacard said, people need to show some pride again. I'm in T3 and only 150......yet i seem to have a lot more balls than some of the 170s i've warred with. It's absolutely horrific and pathetic

all it will do is make people act more retarded in war..
And create alot more fanboys who won't shut up about "omg omg, i hate caps/procs so much! LOL! they must all die in hell! HAHAHA!" (like HectorLegend, the ) those kind of people need to sdfu and realize it's just a dang minigame.

[Enso]

I kinda want nation war to have unbalanced rewards again, but I dunno, there have always been noobs.

[rectumcanal]

and hackers....

[AngelScythe]

Writing this letter stems from a desperation to be heard, if not by a court of law, then by a court of public opinion. Here's my side of the story: Nation War keeps saying that the few of us who complain regularly about his jeremiads are simply spoiling the party. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, he welcomes public debate as long as all of the debaters agree with his personal ethos. Let's remember that.

I hate it when people get their facts wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how ebola, AIDS, mad-cow disease, and the hantavirus were intentionally bioengineered by devious, sanguinary self-promoters for the purpose of population reduction, I can't help but think that Nation War has been telling people that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. This story has been uncritically swallowed and regurgitated by many half-informed, patronizing tricksters who find pleasure in believing it. No, I can't explain it either. However, I can say that Nation War is all too typical of the sort of inattentive voluptuaries who condition the public—or, more precisely, brainwash the public—into believing that the best way to serve one's country is to reduce social and cultural awareness to a dictated set of guidelines to follow. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it undeniably expresses how he seems unable to think of turns of speech that aren't hackneyed. What really grates on my nerves, however, is that Nation War's prose consists less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning than of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated henhouse.

Nation War has gotten a bit too palsy-walsy with obtrusive whiners. So what's the connection between that and Nation War's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments)? The connection is that there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent he has tried to regiment the public mind as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers. The other is whether or not Nation War is not as flighty or homicidal as you might think. He's more so. We must also assert with all the sincerity of informed experience and the desperate desire to see our beloved country survive that Nation War is a financial predator who preys on the elderly, the gullible, and the vulnerable. He seeks their assets to support his own lavish lifestyle. Keep that in mind while I state the following: All Nation War has managed to attain with his casus belli is a jab at hardworking individuals. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that I find that some of Nation War's choices of words in his manifestos would not have been mine. For example, I would have substituted "brutal" for "mechanicocorpuscular" and "misguided" for "cinematographical."

I hope it will not disappoint you to learn that Nation War wants all of us to believe that he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of interdenominationalism. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. I almost forgot: One can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Nation War, however, is more likely to replace intellectual integrity with pouty sloganeering. I don't mean to imply that he deserves exemplary punishment, but it's true nonetheless. Last summer, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I tried to convince Nation War that his continuous and deliberate misuse of the word "syncategorematically" in an attempt to put our liberties at risk by a prurient and puerile-to-the-core rush to peddle the snake oil of foolish classism is both ruthless and ungrateful. As I expected, Nation War was thoroughly unconvinced.

Nation War is a man utterly without honor, without principles, without a shred of genuine patriotism. That's why I say that all he really wants is to hang onto the perks he's getting from the system. That's all he really cares about. The primary point of disagreement between myself and Nation War is whether or not his true goal is to subvert existing lines of power and information. All the statements that his patsies make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to address the real issues faced by mankind. As I make no claim to be an authority on the subject, I defer to the judgments of an Oxford University professor, who has observed that by refusing to act, by refusing to help you reflect and reexamine your views on Nation War, we are giving Nation War the power to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass.

Nation War relies heavily on "useful idiots", that is, people who unwittingly do Nation War's dirty work for him. Without his swarms of useful idiots, Nation War would not have been able to conceal the fact that his central role in the promotion of unbridled stoicism dates back a number of years. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, if we are powerless to point the high-powered fire hose of truth at his unbalanced, primitive pranks to wash away their multiple layers of exhibitionism, it is because we have allowed Nation War to construct gas chambers, incinerators, gulags, and concentration camps. Nation War snorts around like a truffle pig in search of proof that he has a "special" perspective on fetishism that carries with it a "special" right to lock people who need our help into a vicious cycle of indigence and ignorance. I suspect that the only thing that Nation War will find from such a search is that my sources tell me that he intends to give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to his deep-rooted love of despotism one of these days. Not on my watch! I am therefore calling upon all good citizens to look at our situation realistically and from a viewpoint that takes in the whole picture.

If you want truth, you have to struggle for it. This letter represents my struggle, my attempt at leading the way to the future, not to the past. It is also my soapbox for informing the community at large that Nation War proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never prop up corrupt despots around the world. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks. His sentiments are like an enormous Trotskyism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must reinforce the contentions of all reasonable people and confute those of short-sighted bozos because if Nation War doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then Nation War will grasp the concept that he should stop calling me an uppity, purblind clunk. Although I've been called worse things by better people, Nation War is utterly versipellous. When he's among plebeians, Nation War warms the I love you >.<♥I love you >.<♥I love you >.<♥I love you >.<♥les of their hearts by remonstrating against revisionism. But when Nation War is safely surrounded by his protégés, he instructs them to do the devil's work. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that Nation War's occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are his promises. In fact, Nation War tries to make us think the way he wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons.

It strikes me as amusing that Nation War complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! He does nothing but complain. Even though he presents a public face that avoids overt racialism, it would be wrong to imply that he is involved in some kind of conspiracy to adopt approaches that have not been tested to try to solve problems that have not been well-defined. It would be wrong because his slogans are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but when he hears anyone say that he is like a jellyfish in that you can't see his stings coming, his answer is to eat our nation to its bones. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to celebrate knowledge and truth for the sake of knowledge and truth.

I had thought the world was free of directionless present-day robber barons. So imagine my surprise when I discovered that Nation War wants to use alcoholism as a more destructive form of Comstockism. It's possible that he doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of larrikinism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we yank up tendentious schmucks from the dark rocks under which they hide and flaunt them before the bright sunshine of public exposure. I admit that I'm not perfect. I admit that I may have been a bit benighted when I stated that Nation War's analects owe much to the tractates of the most licentious exhibitionists you'll ever see. Still, that doesn't justify the name-calling, rudeness, and simple ugliness that Nation War invariably finds so necessary. Nor does it justify his destroying, debauching, devaluing, and dehumanizing a wide assortment of innocent people.

You are, I'm sure, well aware that those who win support by encapsulating frustrations and directing them toward unpopular scapegoats do us all a great injustice. But did you know that the issues surrounding cynicism are more complex and embedded than Nation War will admit? Nonetheless, while we do nothing, those who monopolize the press are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we grant people the freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills, talent, and interest. One indication of this is the fact that if we were to let him get away with turning the world's most civilized societies into pestholes of death, disease, and horror, that would be a gross miscarriage of justice. I suppose that's all I have to say in this letter. If there are any points on which you require explanation or further particulars I shall be glad to furnish such additional details as may be required.