Originally Posted by
LastHour
Redid your bm2 test:
20 sc - 6 uses
20 Meteor - 6 uses
20 edc - 6 uses
20 af - 7 uses
20 light - 11 uses
20 hail - 11 uses
20 stone - 11 uses
20 vac - 8 uses
20 fire C - 9 uses
20 aqua C - 10 uses
20 terra L - 7 uses
20 fire L - 5 uses
20 aqua L - 3 uses
Total 100 skills for 385927.3 power
I didn't even have to go back and redo my original test for the other build. Even with the correction, you're still behind the 387xxx power of the other build. Those weren't in the proper order of power, fixing that would give me a small boost just as correcting yours did, and we'd be right back at the same difference as we had before just like I said. Funny how that works out.
I hate to break your heart sunshine, but amp buff boosts all skills equally. It makes sense, every skill will gain in base damage by [.25 * your m. atk], so it will all be the same gain among all skills. Same thing on criticals, the extra base damage gained * critical damage = the gain on criticals. Since critical damage hasn't changed and base damage all gained by the same amount, all skills would gain equally both in criticals and non-criticals. Example below:
1000 m. atk, 25% amp buff before/after and 100% critical damage for sake of ease
Skill 1: 1000;2000 -> 1250;2500
Skill 2: 1750;3500 -> 2000;4000 [notice how the differences are the EXACT same as before]
This is a good example, you make some BS claim like "amp buff favors my lower skills more" without backing it up with any evidence other than you eyeballing the game and saying its right. [because apparently having HR18 makes you some kind of cabal guru? Idk]. Then you get upset when we say its possibly wrong, and ask us to disprove it when you failed to admit evidence for the claim in the first place. Making those bs claims up and saying it's right is easier than disproving them, which requires A LOT more work. Seeing as you haven't changed in the entire thread, your just going to keep looking for the tiniest details to say they're wrong to try to vindicate yourself in this topic and hold on to this delusional image of self-importance you think you have in this game. It will never end, no matter if I work every possible situation you give me or not.
You're technically right as I said earlier. At some point the amp of LC > add attack of EDC. However, that point is 2237 m. atk. Aside from AoS B1F, how you plan to gain that much m. atk to prove yourself right is beyond any of us. Its also exponentially more difficult to gain m. atk at end-game, since the differences for better gear are smaller and at some point there is a maximum limit to what you can gain, period.
Ratza and myself had no problem with your preference for level 20 skills, but misusing and preaching things like "max dps" with that setup is why you got caught with your foot in your mouth. I've just ended up repeating myself in what I've said by this point, which is why I chose this post to leave the topic. The claims have been disproven, I've spoken my mind and there is nothing further we could gain in debating this or could prove. Your logic is going in circles now, so I'll let you get the last words in with w/e you want to say. I think we've given the community more than enough proof by now that the data can speak for itself.
Bookmarks